chapter view
sentence 53
prixodexù lemma: prixoždam 'come'
form: 3pl.aor/impf (ipf)
wt+ lemma: ot 'from'
form: preposition
inix lemma: in 'another, different'
form: m.pl.gen/loc.pron
crь, lemma: car 'king, emperor'
form: m.pl.gen
Sentence is unclear due to the unclear subject: maybe *ljudie/pisania ot iněx carei 'people/messages from other kings'? The shortened cri could stand for both pl.nom and gen (and also acc, inst...). Adžar has a corrupted pl.gen-loc phrase here (wt inix crex').
other kings were coming
prositi+ lemma: prosja 'beg, ask'
form: infinitive (pf)
Possibly a misunderstood supine?
Adžar: xotexu ju poeti, Odessa: prosexo
jei lemma: tja 'she'
form: f.3sg.acc (short)
že_nou lemma: žena 'woman'
form: f.sg.gen
The use of sg.gen (< *ženy) is regular (cf. Lunt 2001:145). Adžar has sg.acc (xotěxu ju poeti sebě crcu) due to a different verb.
sě´bě`. lemma: se 'self'
form: refl.gen/acc
to ask her to become their wife
total elements: 8
tree view (.svg)
linear view (Embedded brat):
view .conllu
ROOT prixodexu ot inix crъ prositi jei ženou sěbě
root(prixodexu-2, ROOT)
case(ot-3, inix-4)
obl:abl(inix-4, prixodexu-2)
nsubj(crъ-5, prixodexu-2)
advcl(prositi-6, prixodexu-2)
obj(jei-7, prositi-6)
obl(ženou-8, prositi-6)
obl:iobj(sěbě-9, prositi-6)prixodexù
prixodexu
lemma: prixoždam 'come' LOVe search
inflection: a-verb
prefixes: allative pri-
tag: Vmii3pi
form: 3pl.aor/impf (ipf)
element 1
dependency: root→0
wt+
ot
lemma: ot 'from' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
CS otъ
tag: Sg
form: preposition
element 2
dependency: case→3
inix
inix
lemma: in 'another, different' search
CS
inflection: hard pronominal
tag: Ampgy
form: m.pl.gen/loc.pron
element 3
dependency: obl:abl→1
crь,
crъ
lemma: car 'king, emperor' SJS search
OCS cěsarь, commonly shortened already in oldest texts.
Punčo uses old jo- (pl.nom cari) or monosyllabic stem endings (carove), but elsewhere we can seen also old i-stem endings (carie). Modern BG uses -e taken from other paradigms. The oscillation between i- and jo-stem is also reflected in modern CS grammars (cf. Bončev 1952:16, Mironova 2010:52).
inflection: jo-stem noun
tag: Nmpgy
form: m.pl.gen
element 4
dependency: nsubj→1
Sentence is unclear due to the unclear subject: maybe *ljudie/pisania ot iněx carei 'people/messages from other kings'? The shortened cri could stand for both pl.nom and gen (and also acc, inst...). Adžar has a corrupted pl.gen-loc phrase here (wt inix crex').
prositi+
prositi
lemma: prosja 'beg, ask' SJS LOVe search
Biaspectual in SJS.
inflection: i-verb
tag: Vmn---e
form: infinitive (pf)
element 5
dependency: advcl→1
Possibly a misunderstood supine?
Adžar: xotexu ju poeti, Odessa: prosexo
jei
jei
lemma: tja 'she' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
Also used for f3sg personal pronoun based on the root *j-. Annotation of oblique forms: neja Pp3fsg, nei or i Pp3fsd, ja or ju Pp3fsa
Punčo prefers ona as the f.3sg.nom form.
inflection: nominal pronoun
tag: Pp3fsa
form: f.3sg.acc (short)
element 6
dependency: obj→5
že_nou
ženou
lemma: žena 'woman' search
inflection: ā-stem noun
tag: Nfsgy
form: f.sg.gen
element 7
dependency: obl→5
The use of sg.gen (< *ženy) is regular (cf. Lunt 2001:145). Adžar has sg.acc (xotěxu ju poeti sebě crcu) due to a different verb.
sě´bě`.
sěbě
lemma: se 'self' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
CS sę. The lemma is used for all forms of the reflexive pronoun. Annotation: sebe Px---g, si (and CS sebě) Px---d, se (or sę) Px---a, soboju (or sobojǫ) Px---i.
inflection: nominal pronoun
tag: Px---g
form: refl.gen/acc
element 8
dependency: obl:iobj→5