Verbs based on root *xod-
xaždati
3sg.prs xaždaetъ (i-aje-stem), 2/3sg.aor xažda (i-a-stem)
Leskien class III
ipf aspect
intransitive
motion verb
prefix variation: vъ-, vъz-, do-, iz-, na-, obъ-, otъ-, po-, pri-, pro-, prě- (ipf)
practically redundant, if we take xoditi as the iterative complement of iti: SJS shows only the unprefixed stem in Supr.
a short root vowel is attested in obъxoždati (16th c.)
xoditi
3sg.prs xoditъ (i-stem), 2/3sg.aor xodi (i-stem)
Leskien class IV
ipf aspect
intransitive
motion verb
prefix variation: vъ-, vъs-, do-, za-, iz-, izna-, mimo-, na-, niz-, o-, obъ-, obvъ-, obi-, obъna-, otъ-, podъ-, po-, pona-, pri-, privъ-, prina-, pro-, proiz-, prouna-, prě-, prěvъz-, prědъ-, raz-, sъ-, sъvъ-, sъvъz-, sъna-, sъniz-, sъpo-, u- (ipf)
Derksen (202): etymologically a causative of *sed-
initial x likely originates from a preposition triggering the RUKI-rule (e.g. pri- or u-), the form possibly (cit. Kortlandt) following a reduplicated prs stem *(si)-sd- because of the short vowel
LIV (515): or a denominal of xodъ ʹGangʹ
however, prefixes do not seem to change aspect - the stem seems to function as the newer a-/aje-iteratives do (as a suppletive of iti ? see *id-, Kamphuis 2016:103), although an a-derivation (see xaždati) is already attested in Supr.
Examples in the corpus: doxoždam isxodište isxoždenie izxod izxodja mimoxoditi naxodja nizъxoditi obxodja otxoždam otxoždane poxodvam prěxoditi prixodja prixoždam proxod proxodja sxodja sъxoždati sъxoždenie vъsxoditi vъxoditi vъxoždenie vъzxod xod xodene xodja xoždam xoždenie zaxod zlonaxoždenie
full lexicon