chapter view
sentence 3
tóaı lemma: tъi 'thus'
form: adverb
sfetı´ lemma: svęt 'saint'
form: m.sg.nom.pron
prorók lemma: prorok 'prophet'
form: m.sg.nom
daniíl lemma: Daniil 'Daniel'
form: m.sg.nom
vı´de lemma: vidja 'see'
form: 2/3sg.aor (ipf)
ná lemma: na 'on, to, for'
form: preposition
śtrásnu lemma: strašen 'terrible'
form: n.sg.nom/acc
sadóviaı lemma: sъdovie ''
form: n.sg.nom/acc
góspodova+ lemma: gospodov ''
form: f.sg.nom
ta, lemma: tъ 'the'
form: f.sg.nom
thus saw the Holy Prophet Daniel at the terrible Judgement of the Lord
total elements: 10
tree view (.svg)
linear view (Embedded brat):
view .conllu
ROOT toai sfeti prorok daniil vide na strašnu sadovie gospodova ta
advmod(toai-2, vide-6)
amod(sfeti-3, prorok-4)
nsubj(prorok-4, vide-6)
appos(daniil-5, prorok-4)
root(vide-6, ROOT)
case(na-7, sadovie-9)
amod(strašnu-8, sadovie-9)
obl:loc(sadovie-9, vide-6)
amod:poss(gospodova-10, sadovie-9)
det:p_adj(ta-11, gospodova-10)tóaı
toai
lemma: tъi 'thus' search
suffixes: demonstrative -j-
tag: R
form: adverb
element 1
dependency: advmod→5
sfetı´
sfeti
lemma: svęt 'saint' LOVe search
inflection: hard adjectival
tag: Amsny
form: m.sg.nom.pron
element 2
dependency: amod→3
prorók
prorok
lemma: prorok 'prophet' search
inflection: o-stem noun
prefixes: prolative pro-
tag: Nmsny
form: m.sg.nom
element 3
dependency: nsubj→5
daniíl
daniil
lemma: Daniil 'Daniel' search
inflection: o-stem noun
tag: Nmsny
form: m.sg.nom
element 4
dependency: appos→3
vı´de
vide
lemma: vidja 'see' SJS LOVe search
BG vidja ʹseeʹ is perfective, with viždam as its imperfective counterpart. Punčo uses only the first stem (1sg.prs vidim), which seems to cover both aspects (e.g. both in present and aorist tenses). Biaspectual in SJS.
inflection: i-verb
suffixes: stative -ě-
tag: Vmia3si
form: 2/3sg.aor (ipf)
element 5
dependency: root→0
ná
na
lemma: na 'on, to, for' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
In OCS also ʹagainstʹ (with acc). The dative-like meaning ʹforʹ is attested from the 14th c. onwards.
tag: Sl
form: preposition
element 6
dependency: case→8
śtrásnu
strašnu
lemma: strašen 'terrible' search
inflection: hard adjectival
suffixes: relational -ьn-
tag: Ansnn
form: n.sg.nom/acc
element 7
dependency: amod→8
sadóviaı
sadovie
tag: Nnsnn
form: n.sg.nom/acc
element 8
dependency: obl:loc→5
góspodova+
gospodova
tag: Afsnn
form: f.sg.nom
element 9
dependency: amod:poss→8
ta,
ta
lemma: tъ 'the' search
Lemma used to mark the definite suffix/article.
Sg. forms are recognized, when following adjectives or nouns: tъ Pd-msn, ta Pd-fsn, to Pd-nsn
The plural form te is used for all genders, so the tag reflects either the head noun (if it is masc. - Pd-mpn - or fem. - Pd-fpn) or remains empty (if neut., e.g. izъ oči+te ʹfrom the eyesʹ: Pd--pn). The form ta, if following a plural, is tagged as Pd-npn
The gender of oblique articles like togo is tagged in a similar way, e.g. ta rasrъdi cra togo ʹand he angered the kingʹ: Pd-msg, while if there is no noun, it remains empty, e.g. in CS phrase togo radi ʹbecause of thatʹ: Pd--sg
In CS texts (rarely in PPS too), the root tъ is also used for personal pronouns. If such forms can be syntactically distinguished (i.e. if they precede the head, or do not agree with it in case, gender and number), they are tagged as personal pronouns, e.g. toę oči ʹher eyesʹ: Pp3fsg
The shortened form of the article -o, frequently used by Punčo, is not separated from the preceding token, but rather handled as a quasi-case, e.g. stolʹpo ʹthe pillarʹ: Nmson
inflection: hard stem pronominal
tag: Pd-fsn
form: f.sg.nom
element 10
dependency: det:p_adj→9