ned Nedelnik 1806 - Petka

chapter view

sentence 205

I lemma: i 'and'
form: conjunction

xóčemъ lemma: xoču 'will'
form: 1pl.prs (ipf)

támo lemma: tamo 'there'
form: adverb

da+ lemma: da 'to'
form: conjunction

vídimъ lemma: vidja 'see'
form: 1pl.prs (ipf)

štò lemma: što 'what'
form: relative

nikogà lemma: nikoga 'never'
form: negative

né+ lemma: ne 'no, not'
form: negation particle

sme lemma: sъm 'be'
form: 1pl.prs (ipf)

víděli. lemma: vidja 'see'
form: 1pl.prs (ipf)


and we will see there what we have not ever seen

total elements: 10


tree view (.svg)
linear view (Embedded brat):
view .conllu

ROOT i xočemъ tamo da vidimъ što nikoga ne sme viděli 
cc(i-2, vidimъ-6)
aux:fut(xočemъ-3, vidimъ-6)
advmod(tamo-4, vidimъ-6)
fixed:inf(da-5, xočemъ-3)
root(vidimъ-6, ROOT)
mark(što-7, viděli-11)
advmod(nikoga-8, viděli-11)
advmod(ne-9, sme-10)
aux:prf(sme-10, viděli-11)
advcl(viděli-11, vidimъ-6)


I
i
lemma: i 'and' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
tag: C
form: conjunction
element 1
dependency: cc→5


xóčemъ
xočemъ
lemma: xoču 'will' LOVe search
A variant of šta, likely a SC (or possibly Eastern CS) influence, also often used as future auxilia. Used if /č/ is a part of the word form. Punčo uses for 3pl.prs forms both xočat and xočut.
inflection: e-verb
tag: Vaip1pi
form: 1pl.prs (ipf)
element 2
dependency: aux:fut→5


támo
tamo
lemma: tamo 'there' search
Modern BG codifies tam, but older sources use prevalently tamo, which is common in CS texts too. Originally an allative correlant of tu, it seems to have replaced it in a static locative function too (e.g. sьtvori tamo čjudesa ʹhe did there miraclesʹ here).
suffixes: allative -amo
tag: R
form: adverb
element 3
dependency: advmod→5


da+
da
lemma: da 'to' search
See the Reference Grammar for more details on the use of its function.
tag: C
form: conjunction
element 4
dependency: fixed:inf→2


vídimъ
vidimъ
lemma: vidja 'see' SJS LOVe search
BG vidja ʹseeʹ is perfective, with viždam as its imperfective counterpart. Punčo uses only the first stem (1sg.prs vidim), which seems to cover both aspects (e.g. both in present and aorist tenses). Biaspectual in SJS.
inflection: i-verb
suffixes: stative -ě-
tag: Vmip1pi
form: 1pl.prs (ipf)
element 5
dependency: root→0


štò
što
lemma: što 'what' search
Often used as relative pronoun (without the -to suffix) by Punčo. See čьto for etymology.
inflection: nominal pronoun
tag: Pr
form: relative
element 6
dependency: mark→10


nikogà
nikoga
lemma: nikoga 'never' search
tag: Pz
form: negative
element 7
dependency: advmod→10


né+
ne
lemma: ne 'no, not' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
tag: Qz
form: negation particle
element 8
dependency: advmod→9


sme
sme
lemma: sъm 'be' SJS LOVe search
Used for most forms of the ʹbeʹ verb, including the (CS) infinitive byti, and excluding only perfective forms based on present stem bъda. In OCS, bъda is used also for the infinitive and other forms based on the aorist stem.
inflection: athematic
tag: Vaip1pi
form: 1pl.prs (ipf)
element 9
dependency: aux:prf→10


víděli.
viděli
lemma: vidja 'see' SJS LOVe search
BG vidja ʹseeʹ is perfective, with viždam as its imperfective counterpart. Punčo uses only the first stem (1sg.prs vidim), which seems to cover both aspects (e.g. both in present and aorist tenses). Biaspectual in SJS.
inflection: i-verb
suffixes: stative -ě-
tag: Vmip1pi
form: 1pl.prs (ipf)
element 10
dependency: advcl→5