ned Nedelnik 1806 - Petka

chapter view

sentence 152

Í+ lemma: i 'and'
form: conjunction

na lemma: na 'on, to, for'
form: preposition

oútre lemma: utro 'in the morning'
form: n.sg.loc

i+ lemma: i 'and'
form: conjunction

dvoíca+ lemma: dvoica 'pair'
form: f.sg.nom

ta lemma: 'the'
form: f.sg.nom

skazáli lemma: skaža 'tell'
form: l-ptcp (pf)
alt.analysis: pl

na lemma: na 'on, to, for'
form: preposition

vsì lemma: vsě ''
form: n.pl.nom/acc

ljúdïe lemma: ljudie 'people'
form: m.pl.nom

štò lemma: što 'what'
form: relative

víděli. lemma: vidja 'see'
form: l-ptcp (ipf)
alt.analysis: pl


and in the morning the both tol (what they heard) to all the people they met

total elements: 12


tree view (.svg)
linear view (Embedded brat):
view .conllu

ROOT I na outre i dvoica ta skazali na vsi ljudie što viděli 
cc(I-2, skazali-8)
case(na-3, outre-4)
obl:loc(outre-4, skazali-8)
amod(i-5, dvoica-6)
nsubj(dvoica-6, skazali-8)
det:p_nom(ta-7, dvoica-6)
root:prf(skazali-8, ROOT)
case(na-9, ljudie-11)
amod(vsi-10, ljudie-11)
obl:iobj(ljudie-11, skazali-8)
mark(što-12, viděli-13)
advcl:prf(viděli-13, skazali-8)


Í+
I
lemma: i 'and' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
tag: C
form: conjunction
element 1
dependency: cc→7


na
na
lemma: na 'on, to, for' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
In OCS also ʹagainstʹ (with acc). The dative-like meaning ʹforʹ is attested from the 14th c. onwards.
tag: Sl
form: preposition
element 2
dependency: case→3


oútre
outre
lemma: utro 'in the morning' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
CS
suffixes: n.sg.nom/acc -o
tag: Nnsln
form: n.sg.loc
element 3
dependency: obl:loc→7


i+
i
lemma: i 'and' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
tag: C
form: conjunction
element 4
dependency: amod→5


dvoíca+
dvoica
lemma: dvoica 'pair' search
inflection: jā-stem noun
suffixes: singulative -ica
tag: Nfsnn
form: f.sg.nom
element 5
dependency: nsubj→7


ta
ta
lemma: 'the' search
Lemma used to mark the definite suffix/article.
Sg. forms are recognized, when following adjectives or nouns: Pd-msn, ta Pd-fsn, to Pd-nsn
The plural form te is used for all genders, so the tag reflects either the head noun (if it is masc. - Pd-mpn - or fem. - Pd-fpn) or remains empty (if neut., e.g. izъ oči+te ʹfrom the eyesʹ: Pd--pn). The form ta, if following a plural, is tagged as Pd-npn
The gender of oblique articles like togo is tagged in a similar way, e.g. ta rasrъdi cra togo ʹand he angered the kingʹ: Pd-msg, while if there is no noun, it remains empty, e.g. in CS phrase togo radi ʹbecause of thatʹ: Pd--sg
In CS texts (rarely in PPS too), the root is also used for personal pronouns. If such forms can be syntactically distinguished (i.e. if they precede the head, or do not agree with it in case, gender and number), they are tagged as personal pronouns, e.g. toę oči ʹher eyesʹ: Pp3fsg
The shortened form of the article -o, frequently used by Punčo, is not separated from the preceding token, but rather handled as a quasi-case, e.g. stolʹpo ʹthe pillarʹ: Nmson

inflection: hard stem pronominal
tag: Pd-fsn
form: f.sg.nom
element 6
dependency: det:p_nom→5


skazáli
skazali
lemma: skaža 'tell' SJS SNSP Miklosich LOVe search
BAN II 139: skaža, skazvam ʹrazkazvamʹ. CS sъkazati ʹshowʹ.
inflection: e-verb
prefixes: delative sъ-
tag: Vmp--pe or A-pnn
form: l-ptcp (pf) or pl
element 7
dependency: root:prf→0


na
na
lemma: na 'on, to, for' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
In OCS also ʹagainstʹ (with acc). The dative-like meaning ʹforʹ is attested from the 14th c. onwards.
tag: Sa
form: preposition
element 8
dependency: case→10


vsì
vsi
tag: Anpnn
form: n.pl.nom/acc
element 9
dependency: amod→10


ljúdïe
ljudie
lemma: ljudie 'people' search
CS pl.nom ljudie, pl.acc ljudi - sometimes distinguished by Punčo too! The current standard BG form is unclear (BAN III 577: ljudi, rechnik.chitanka: ljude).
inflection: i-stem noun
tag: Nmpny
form: m.pl.nom
element 10
dependency: obl:iobj→7


štò
što
lemma: što 'what' search
Often used as relative pronoun (without the -to suffix) by Punčo. See čьto for etymology.
inflection: nominal pronoun
tag: Pr
form: relative
element 11
dependency: mark→12


víděli.
viděli
lemma: vidja 'see' SJS LOVe search
BG vidja ʹseeʹ is perfective, with viždam as its imperfective counterpart. Punčo uses only the first stem (1sg.prs vidim), which seems to cover both aspects (e.g. both in present and aorist tenses). Biaspectual in SJS.
inflection: i-verb
suffixes: stative -ě-
tag: Vmp--pi or A-pnn
form: l-ptcp (ipf) or pl
element 12
dependency: advcl:prf→7