kvd Kiev Damaskin 27

chapter view

sentence 252

i+ lemma: i 'and'
form: conjunction

kai pēgenamenē me eiden henas xriśtianos
Bakačič: Idúšti+ že mně`, vidě` mè edínь Xristianínь, i izjétь trì cáty, i dástь mì za imè Xvo


xoděštu+ lemma: xoditi ''
form: ptcp.prs.act
alt.analysis: m.sg.dat

Could be analyzed as f.sg.acc too, but a dative absolute makes sense. Such forms (m.sg participle with mi, with Maria as subject) are common in CIAI 1570, based on an older translation. This form seems to have been described by Mirčev (1978:243 - udlъžanieto na deepričastie -mi).

mi lemma: az 'I'
form: 1sg.dat

víděv+ lemma: viděti ''
form: ptcp.aor.act
alt.analysis: m.sg.nom

gr. eiden: 3sg.aor

me+ lemma: az 'I'
form: 1sg.acc

ně´ky lemma: někoi 'someone'
form: m.sg.nom.pron

xrstïáninь, lemma: xristianin 'Christian'
form: m.sg.nom


ʺand as I went, one Christian saw meʺ

total elements: 7


tree view (.svg)
linear view (Embedded brat):
view .conllu

ROOT i xoděštu+ mi viděv me něki xrstianinъ 
cc(i-2, viděv-5)
advcl(xoděštu+-3, viděv-5)
nsubj(mi-4, xoděštu+-3)
root(viděv-5, ROOT)
obj(me-6, viděv-5)
amod(něki-7, xrstianinъ-8)
nsubj(xrstianinъ-8, me-6)


i+
i
lemma: i 'and' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
tag: C
form: conjunction
element 1
dependency: cc→4
kai pēgenamenē me eiden henas xriśtianos
Bakačič: Idúšti+ že mně`, vidě` mè edínь Xristianínь, i izjétь trì cáty, i dástь mì za imè Xvo


xoděštu+
xoděštu+
tag: Vmpp-sia or Amsdn
form: ptcp.prs.act or m.sg.dat
element 2
dependency: advcl→4
Could be analyzed as f.sg.acc too, but a dative absolute makes sense. Such forms (m.sg participle with mi, with Maria as subject) are common in CIAI 1570, based on an older translation. This form seems to have been described by Mirčev (1978:243 - udlъžanieto na deepričastie -mi).


mi
mi
lemma: az 'I' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
Annotation uses the following scheme, even if long and short forms can fulfill different syntactic functions: mene Pp1-sg, mi Pp1-sd, me Pp1-sa
inflection: nominal pronoun
tag: Pp1-sd
form: 1sg.dat
element 3
dependency: nsubj→2


víděv+
viděv
tag: Vmpa-sia or Amsnn
form: ptcp.aor.act or m.sg.nom
element 4
dependency: root→0
gr. eiden: 3sg.aor


me+
me
lemma: az 'I' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
Annotation uses the following scheme, even if long and short forms can fulfill different syntactic functions: mene Pp1-sg, mi Pp1-sd, me Pp1-sa
inflection: nominal pronoun
tag: Pp1-sa
form: 1sg.acc
element 5
dependency: obj→4


ně´ky
něki
lemma: někoi 'someone' search
Handled as A, if used adnominally (e.g. někoi člkь).
inflection: nominal pronoun
tag: Amsny
form: m.sg.nom.pron
element 6
dependency: amod→7


xrstïáninь,
xrstianinъ
lemma: xristianin 'Christian' search
Punčo uses both -e and -i in pl.nom (6 vs. 9 in first 20 ch.)
inflection: ethno-stem noun
suffixes: singulative -inъ
tag: Nmsny
form: m.sg.nom
element 7
dependency: nsubj→5