chapter view
sentence 119
dïávolь lemma: diavol 'devil'
form: m.sg.nom
razumě` lemma: razumeja 'understand'
form: 2/3sg.aor (ipf)
čtô+ lemma: čьto ''
form: interrogative
e lemma: sъm 'be'
form: 3sg.prs (ipf)
réklь lemma: reka 'say'
form: l-ptcp (pf)
alt.analysis: m.sg.nom
mál'xь lemma: Malax ''
form: m.sg.nom
na+ lemma: na 'on, to, for'
form: preposition
žénъ+ lemma: žena 'woman'
form: f.sg.def
ta+ lemma: tъ 'the'
form: f.sg.nom
sî. lemma: se 'self'
form: refl.dat
The Devil understood, what Malach had said to his wife
total elements: 10
tree view (.svg)
linear view (Embedded brat):
view .conllu
ROOT diavolъ razumě čto e reklъ malъxъ na ženъ ta si
nsubj(diavolъ-2, razumě-3)
root(razumě-3, ROOT)
mark(čto-4, reklъ-6)
aux:prf(e-5, reklъ-6)
advcl(reklъ-6, razumě-3)
nsubj(malъxъ-7, reklъ-6)
case(na-8, ženъ-9)
obl:iobj(ženъ-9, reklъ-6)
det:p_nom(ta-10, ženъ-9)
nmod:poss(si-11, ženъ-9)dïávolь
diavolъ
lemma: diavol 'devil' search
inflection: o-stem noun
tag: Nmsny
form: m.sg.nom
element 1
dependency: nsubj→2
razumě`
razumě
lemma: razumeja 'understand' SJS SNSP Miklosich LOVe search
Biaspectual in SJS.
inflection: e-verb
prefixes: distributive raz-
suffixes: stative -ě-
tag: Vmia3si
form: 2/3sg.aor (ipf)
element 2
dependency: root→0
čtô+
čto
tag: Pq
form: interrogative
element 3
dependency: mark→5
e
e
lemma: sъm 'be' SJS LOVe search
Used for most forms of the ʹbeʹ verb, including the (CS) infinitive byti, and excluding only perfective forms based on present stem bъda. In OCS, bъda is used also for the infinitive and other forms based on the aorist stem.
inflection: athematic
tag: Vaip3si
form: 3sg.prs (ipf)
element 4
dependency: aux:prf→5
réklь
reklъ
lemma: reka 'say' SJS SNSP Miklosich LOVe search
CS rešti, 1sg.prs rekǫ, 2sg rečeši, 1sg.aor rěxъ, 2sg reče. Considered biaspectual in SJS/SNSP because of common use in present participles (Kamphuis 2016:219, link). Tagged as perfective in OCS too, because of contrast to glagolati.
inflection: e-verb
tag: Vmp--se or Amsnn
form: l-ptcp (pf) or m.sg.nom
element 5
dependency: advcl→2
mál'xь
malъxъ
tag: Nmsny
form: m.sg.nom
element 6
dependency: nsubj→5
na+
na
lemma: na 'on, to, for' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
In OCS also ʹagainstʹ (with acc). The dative-like meaning ʹforʹ is attested from the 14th c. onwards.
tag: Sa
form: preposition
element 7
dependency: case→8
žénъ+
ženъ
lemma: žena 'woman' search
inflection: ā-stem noun
tag: Nfsoy
form: f.sg.def
element 8
dependency: obl:iobj→5
ta+
ta
lemma: tъ 'the' search
Lemma used to mark the definite suffix/article.
Sg. forms are recognized, when following adjectives or nouns: tъ Pd-msn, ta Pd-fsn, to Pd-nsn
The plural form te is used for all genders, so the tag reflects either the head noun (if it is masc. - Pd-mpn - or fem. - Pd-fpn) or remains empty (if neut., e.g. izъ oči+te ʹfrom the eyesʹ: Pd--pn). The form ta, if following a plural, is tagged as Pd-npn
The gender of oblique articles like togo is tagged in a similar way, e.g. ta rasrъdi cra togo ʹand he angered the kingʹ: Pd-msg, while if there is no noun, it remains empty, e.g. in CS phrase togo radi ʹbecause of thatʹ: Pd--sg
In CS texts (rarely in PPS too), the root tъ is also used for personal pronouns. If such forms can be syntactically distinguished (i.e. if they precede the head, or do not agree with it in case, gender and number), they are tagged as personal pronouns, e.g. toę oči ʹher eyesʹ: Pp3fsg
The shortened form of the article -o, frequently used by Punčo, is not separated from the preceding token, but rather handled as a quasi-case, e.g. stolʹpo ʹthe pillarʹ: Nmson
inflection: hard stem pronominal
tag: Pd-fsn
form: f.sg.nom
element 9
dependency: det:p_nom→8
sî.
si
lemma: se 'self' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
CS sę. The lemma is used for all forms of the reflexive pronoun. Annotation: sebe Px---g, si (and CS sebě) Px---d, se (or sę) Px---a, soboju (or sobojǫ) Px---i.
inflection: nominal pronoun
tag: Px---d
form: refl.dat
element 10
dependency: nmod:poss→8