chapter view
sentence 326
i- lemma: i 'and'
form: conjunction
śtı`m lemma: šta 'want'
form: 1pl.prs (ipf)
da+ lemma: da 'to'
form: conjunction
vídım lemma: vidja 'see'
form: 1pl.prs (ipf)
támo lemma: tamo 'there'
form: adverb
déto lemma: deto 'which'
form: relative
nı´kogi lemma: nikoga 'never'
form: negative
nı+ lemma: ne 'no, not'
form: negation particle
ṣmé lemma: sъm 'be'
form: 1pl.prs (ipf)
vízdalı. lemma: vidja 'see'
form: l-ptcp (ipf)
and we will see there what we have never seen
total elements: 10
tree view (.svg)
linear view (Embedded brat):
view .conllu
ROOT i štim da vidim tamo deto nikogi ni sme viždali
cc(i-2, vidim-5)
aux:fut(štim-3, vidim-5)
fixed:inf(da-4, štim-3)
root(vidim-5, ROOT)
advmod(tamo-6, vidim-5)
mark(deto-7, viždali-11)
advmod(nikogi-8, viždali-11)
advmod(ni-9, viždali-11)
aux:prf(sme-10, viždali-11)
advcl(viždali-11, vidim-5)i-
i
lemma: i 'and' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
tag: C
form: conjunction
element 1
dependency: cc→4
śtı`m
štim
lemma: šta 'want' LOVe search
Includes the future particle šte - Punčo still inflects it for person, using a full da-construction (e.g. 2pl štete da rečete ʹyou will sayʹ), but there are also other forms attested, e.g. "indefinite future" with a synthetic infinitive (2sg uze štešь potrebiju ʹyou will get what you needʹ).
The lemma belongs to a group of auxiliary verbs, which require the main verb in infinitive or in da-construction (cf. Mirčev 1978:235)
inflection: e-verb
tag: Vaip1pi
form: 1pl.prs (ipf)
element 2
dependency: aux:fut→4
da+
da
lemma: da 'to' search
See the Reference Grammar for more details on the use of its function.
tag: C
form: conjunction
element 3
dependency: fixed:inf→2
vídım
vidim
lemma: vidja 'see' SJS LOVe search
BG vidja ʹseeʹ is perfective, with viždam as its imperfective counterpart. Punčo uses only the first stem (1sg.prs vidim), which seems to cover both aspects (e.g. both in present and aorist tenses). Biaspectual in SJS.
inflection: i-verb
suffixes: stative -ě-
tag: Vmip1pi
form: 1pl.prs (ipf)
element 4
dependency: root→0
támo
tamo
lemma: tamo 'there' search
Modern BG codifies tam, but older sources use prevalently tamo, which is common in CS texts too. Originally an allative correlant of tu, it seems to have replaced it in a static locative function too (e.g. sьtvori tamo čjudesa ʹhe did there miraclesʹ here).
suffixes: allative -amo
tag: R
form: adverb
element 5
dependency: advmod→4
déto
deto
lemma: deto 'which' search
A common relative pronoun based on kъde-to ʹwhereʹ.
tag: Pr
form: relative
element 6
dependency: mark→10
nı´kogi
nikogi
lemma: nikoga 'never' search
tag: Pz
form: negative
element 7
dependency: advmod→10
nı+
ni
lemma: ne 'no, not' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
tag: Qz
form: negation particle
element 8
dependency: advmod→10
ṣmé
sme
lemma: sъm 'be' SJS LOVe search
Used for most forms of the ʹbeʹ verb, including the (CS) infinitive byti, and excluding only perfective forms based on present stem bъda. In OCS, bъda is used also for the infinitive and other forms based on the aorist stem.
inflection: athematic
tag: Vaip1pi
form: 1pl.prs (ipf)
element 9
dependency: aux:prf→10
vízdalı.
viždali
lemma: vidja 'see' SJS LOVe search
BG vidja ʹseeʹ is perfective, with viždam as its imperfective counterpart. Punčo uses only the first stem (1sg.prs vidim), which seems to cover both aspects (e.g. both in present and aorist tenses). Biaspectual in SJS.
inflection: i-verb
suffixes: stative -ě-
tag: Vmp--pi
form: l-ptcp (ipf)
element 10
dependency: advcl→4