chapter view
sentence 101
paky lemma: paki 'again'
form: adverb
The following two sentences sound weirdly, likely because of missing (or wrongly translated) subordination markers. Cf. Veles: da egda wtxoždaše si vь domь svoi, glaše kь crci
wtxoždaše. lemma: otxoždam 'leave'
form: 2/3sg.impf (ipf)
vь+ lemma: v 'in'
form: preposition
domь lemma: dom 'house'
form: m.sg.nom/acc
svoi. lemma: svoi 'of oneself'
form: m.sg.nom.pron
total elements: 5
tree view (.svg)
linear view (Embedded brat):
view .conllu
ROOT paki otxoždaše vъ domъ svoi
advmod(paki-3, otxoždaše-6)
root(otxoždaše-6, ROOT)
case(vъ-7, domъ-8)
obl:lat(domъ-8, otxoždaše-6)
amod:poss(svoi-9, domъ-8)paky
paki
lemma: paki 'again' search
An older variant of pak? CS also paky.
suffixes: n.pl.inst -y
tag: R
form: adverb
element 2
dependency: advmod→5
The following two sentences sound weirdly, likely because of missing (or wrongly translated) subordination markers. Cf. Veles: da egda wtxoždaše si vь domь svoi, glaše kь crci
wtxoždaše.
otxoždaše
lemma: otxoždam 'leave' LOVe search
inflection: a-verb
prefixes: ablative otъ-
suffixes: iterative -ja-
tag: Vmii3si
form: 2/3sg.impf (ipf)
element 5
dependency: root→0
vь+
vъ
lemma: v 'in' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
inflection: with loc or acc
tag: Sl
form: preposition
element 6
dependency: case→7
domь
domъ
lemma: dom 'house' SJS search
A u-stem in CS. The form (u) doma is tagged as sg.gen, likely showing a generalized o-stem ending. The nominal form in OCS was domu - but already besides adverbial doma (SJS: link). Olander (2015:173) mentions interpretations of the form as an irregular sg.loc, maybe an old allative (Fortson 2004:105) reinterpreted as static location?
inflection: monosyllabic noun
tag: Nmsnn
form: m.sg.nom/acc
element 7
dependency: obl:lat→5
svoi.
svoi
lemma: svoi 'of oneself' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
A reflexive-possessive adjective.
inflection: soft pronominal
suffixes: possessive -ьj-
tag: Amsny
form: m.sg.nom.pron
element 8
dependency: amod:poss→7