chapter view
sentence 386
zašto lemma: zašto 'for'
form: conjunction
tí lemma: ti 'you'
form: 2sg.nom
ʾefimiane lemma: Evfimian 'Euphemianus'
form: m.sg.voc
u+ lemma: u 'at'
form: preposition
doma lemma: dom 'house'
form: m.sg.gen
tvo_ego lemma: tvoi 'your'
form: m.sg.gen/acc.pron
kríešь lemma: krija 'hide'
form: 2sg.prs (ipf)
mlogo_cénoe lemma: mlogocenen 'precious'
form: n.sg.nom/acc.pron
telò lemma: tělo 'body'
form: n.sg.nom/acc
čl͂ve_česko lemma: človečeski 'of humans'
form: n.sg.nom/acc
ʺ(In) the house of Euphemianus, there is the Man of God.ʺ
total elements: 10
tree view (.svg)
linear view (Embedded brat):
view .conllu
ROOT zašto ti efimiane u doma tvoego kriešъ mlogocenoe telo člvečesko
cc(zašto-2, kriešъ-8)
nsubj(ti-3, kriešъ-8)
vocative(efimiane-4, ti-3)
case(u-5, doma-6)
obl:loc(doma-6, kriešъ-8)
amod:poss(tvoego-7, doma-6)
root(kriešъ-8, ROOT)
amod(mlogocenoe-9, telo-10)
obj(telo-10, kriešъ-8)
amod(člvečesko-11, telo-10)zašto
zašto
lemma: zašto 'for' search
Used commonly with the relative meaning of zaštoto. Could be also analyzed as an interrogative pronoun. Sometimes, Paisius (and Punčo) uses it in the consequent meaning ʹthatʹ - like što or če. See čto for etymology.
suffixes: demonstrative -to
tag: C
form: conjunction
element 1
dependency: cc→7
tí
ti
lemma: ti 'you' search
Annotation of oblique forms: tebe Pp2-sg, te Pp2-sa
The nominative and dative forms are homonymous (ti) in both vernacular and literature, including PPS. A distinct 2sg.nom ty is sometimes used regularily in CS texts - if so, this is specially indicated in corpus files by using the lemma ty.
inflection: nominal pronoun
tag: Pp2-sn
form: 2sg.nom
element 2
dependency: nsubj→7
ʾefimiane
efimiane
lemma: Evfimian 'Euphemianus' search
inflection: hard stem noun
tag: Nmsvy
form: m.sg.voc
element 3
dependency: vocative→2
u+
u
lemma: u 'at' search
tag: Sg
form: preposition
element 4
dependency: case→5
doma
doma
lemma: dom 'house' SJS search
A u-stem in CS. The form (u) doma is tagged as sg.gen, likely showing a generalized o-stem ending. The nominal form in OCS was domu - but already besides adverbial doma (SJS: link). Olander (2015:173) mentions interpretations of the form as an irregular sg.loc, maybe an old allative (Fortson 2004:105) reinterpreted as static location?
inflection: monosyllabic noun
tag: Nmsgn
form: m.sg.gen
element 5
dependency: obl:loc→7
tvo_ego
tvoego
lemma: tvoi 'your' search
inflection: soft pronominal
suffixes: possessive -ьj-
tag: Amsgy
form: m.sg.gen/acc.pron
element 6
dependency: amod:poss→5
kríešь
kriešъ
lemma: krija 'hide' SJS LOVe search
inflection: e-verb
tag: Vmip2si
form: 2sg.prs (ipf)
element 7
dependency: root→0
mlogo_cénoe
mlogocenoe
lemma: mlogocenen 'precious' search
inflection: hard adjectival
suffixes: relational -ьn-
tag: Ansny
form: n.sg.nom/acc.pron
element 8
dependency: amod→9
telò
telo
lemma: tělo 'body' search
inflection: s-stem noun
tag: Nnsnn
form: n.sg.nom/acc
element 9
dependency: obj→7
čl͂ve_česko
člvečesko
lemma: človečeski 'of humans' search
inflection: hard adjectival
suffixes: relational -ьsk-
tag: Ansnn
form: n.sg.nom/acc
element 10
dependency: amod→9