chapter view
sentence 12
prostí+ lemma: prost 'simple'
form: m.pl.nom
mi lemma: az 'I'
form: 1sg.dat
gd͒ne lemma: Gospoden 'Lordʹs'
form: n.sg.nom/acc
tója lemma: toja 'that'
form: m.sg.nom
dlь´gь lemma: dъlъg 'long'
form: m.sg.nom/acc
ʺForgive me that debt, o lord!ʺ
total elements: 5
tree view (.svg)
linear view (Embedded brat):
view .conllu
ROOT prosti mi gdne toja dlъgъ
root(prosti-2, ROOT)
obl:iobj(mi-3, prosti-2)
vocative(gdne-4, prosti-2)
det:ext(toja-5, dlъgъ-6)
obj(dlъgъ-6, prosti-2)prostí+
prosti
lemma: prost 'simple' search
inflection: hard adjectival
tag: Ampnn
form: m.pl.nom
element 1
dependency: root→0
mi
mi
lemma: az 'I' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
Annotation uses the following scheme, even if long and short forms can fulfill different syntactic functions: mene Pp1-sg, mi Pp1-sd, me Pp1-sa
inflection: nominal pronoun
tag: Pp1-sd
form: 1sg.dat
element 2
dependency: obl:iobj→1
gd͒ne
gdne
lemma: Gospoden 'Lordʹs' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
Often given as gdnь. Oblique forms like gdně/gdnju are ambiguous: could be seen as sg.gen of Gospod too.
inflection: soft adjectival
suffixes: relational -ьn-
tag: Ansnn
form: n.sg.nom/acc
element 3
dependency: vocative→1
tója
toja
lemma: toja 'that' search
The basic form reflects m.sg.nom, but the lemma also covers f.sg.nom taja (Pd-fsn), f.sg.acc tuju (Pd-fsa) and pl.nom tija (Pd--pa).
inflection: hard stem pronominal
suffixes: demonstrative -j-
tag: Pd-msn
form: m.sg.nom
element 4
dependency: det:ext→5
dlь´gь
dlъgъ
lemma: dъlъg 'long' search
CS dlьgъ - of course, dlъgъ is attested too (lemma in Miklosich has ъ in root too), but an ь is plausible due to Lith. ilgas ʹlongʹ (Derksen 2008:133).
inflection: hard adjectival
tag: Nmsnn
form: m.sg.nom/acc
element 5
dependency: obj→1