chapter view
sentence 302
togíva lemma: togiva 'then'
form: relative
vidè lemma: vidja 'see'
form: 2/3sg.aor (pf)
ʾántíxrisь lemma: Antixrist 'Antichrist'
form: m.sg.nom
za_što lemma: zašto 'for'
form: conjunction
né+ lemma: ne 'no, not'
form: negation particle
ma lemma: imam 'have'
form: 3sg.prs (ipf)
lь´ža lemma: lъža 'lie'
form: f.sg.nom
u+ lemma: u 'at'
form: preposition
ar͂xgela lemma: Arxangel ''
form: m.sg.gen/acc.anim
Then the Antichrist saw why there was no lie in the Archangel
total elements: 9
tree view (.svg)
linear view (Embedded brat):
view .conllu
ROOT togiva vide antixrisъ zašto ne ma lъža u arxgela
advmod(togiva-2, vide-3)
root(vide-3, ROOT)
nsubj(antixrisъ-4, vide-3)
mark(zašto-5, ma-7)
advmod(ne-6, ma-7)
root(ma-7, vide-3)
obj(lъža-8, ma-7)
case(u-9, arxgela-10)
obl:loc(arxgela-10, ma-7)
togíva
togiva
lemma: togiva 'then' search
suffixes: demonstrative -va
tag: Pr
form: relative
element 1
dependency: advmod→2
vidè
vide
lemma: vidja 'see' SJS LOVe search
BG vidja ʹseeʹ is perfective, with viždam as its imperfective counterpart. Punčo uses only the first stem (1sg.prs vidim), which seems to cover both aspects (e.g. both in present and aorist tenses). Biaspectual in SJS.
inflection: i-verb
suffixes: stative -ě-
tag: Vmia3se
form: 2/3sg.aor (pf)
element 2
dependency: root→0
ʾántíxrisь
antixrisъ
lemma: Antixrist 'Antichrist' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
inflection: o-stem noun
tag: Nmsny
form: m.sg.nom
element 3
dependency: nsubj→2
za_što
zašto
lemma: zašto 'for' search
Used commonly with the relative meaning of zaštoto. Could be also analyzed as an interrogative pronoun. Sometimes, Paisius (and Punčo) uses it in the consequent meaning ʹthatʹ - like što or če. See čto for etymology.
suffixes: demonstrative -to
tag: C
form: conjunction
element 4
dependency: mark→6
né+
ne
lemma: ne 'no, not' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
tag: Qz
form: negation particle
element 5
dependency: advmod→6
ma
ma
lemma: imam 'have' SJS LOVe search
CS iměti (irregular ě-/a-verb: 1sg.prs imamь, 2sg imaši) or imati (an a-/je-verb: 1sg.prs emljǫ, 2sg emlješi, SJS - link). Punčo uses various 3pl.prs forms - e.g. in chapter 062a, sentences following each other show imutь, imajutь and imatь.
inflection: a-verb
tag: Vmip3si
form: 3sg.prs (ipf)
element 6
dependency: root→2
lь´ža
lъža
lemma: lъža 'lie' search
inflection: jā-stem noun
tag: Nfsnn
form: f.sg.nom
element 7
dependency: obj→6
u+
u
lemma: u 'at' search
tag: Sg
form: preposition
element 8
dependency: case→9
ar͂xgela
arxgela
tag: Nmsgy
form: m.sg.gen/acc.anim
element 9
dependency: obl:loc→6