chapter view
sentence 825
i+ lemma: i 'and'
form: conjunction
ne+ lemma: ne 'no, not'
form: negation particle
iměxǫ lemma: imam 'have'
form: 3pl.aor/impf (pf)
čto lemma: čto 'what'
form: interrogative
wtvěštati+ lemma: otvěštati 'answer'
form: infinitive (pf)
ourekšišou. lemma: Urekšiš 'Ulysses'
form: m.sg.dat
And they had nothing to answer to Ulysses.
total elements: 6
tree view (.svg)
linear view (Embedded brat):
view .conllu
ROOT i ne iměxǫ čto otvěštati ourekšišou
cc(i-2, iměxǫ-4)
advmod(ne-3, iměxǫ-4)
root(iměxǫ-4, ROOT)
mark(čto-5, otvěštati-6)
advcl:obj(otvěštati-6, iměxǫ-4)
obl:iobj(ourekšišou-7, otvěštati-6)i+
i
lemma: i 'and' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
tag: C
form: conjunction
element 1
dependency: cc→3
ne+
ne
lemma: ne 'no, not' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
tag: Qz
form: negation particle
element 2
dependency: advmod→3
iměxǫ
iměxǫ
lemma: imam 'have' SJS LOVe search
CS iměti (irregular ě-/a-verb: 1sg.prs imamь, 2sg imaši) or imati (an a-/je-verb: 1sg.prs emljǫ, 2sg emlješi, SJS - link). Punčo uses various 3pl.prs forms - e.g. in chapter 062a, sentences following each other show imutь, imajutь and imatь.
inflection: a-verb
tag: Vmii3pe
form: 3pl.aor/impf (pf)
element 3
dependency: root→0
čto
čto
lemma: čto 'what' search
CS čьto. Similarly as kъto, the construction is etymologically the same as in modern BG relative pronouns: an interrogative root (going back to PIE *kʷ-) followed by the demonstrative suffix -to.
inflection: nominal pronoun
suffixes: demonstrative -to
tag: Pq
form: interrogative
element 4
dependency: mark→5
wtvěštati+
otvěštati
lemma: otvěštati 'answer' SJS LOVe search
CS. Biaspectual in SJS.
inflection: e-verb
prefixes: ablative otъ-
suffixes: iterative -ja-
tag: Vmn---e
form: infinitive (pf)
element 5
dependency: advcl:obj→3
ourekšišou.
ourekšišou
lemma: Urekšiš 'Ulysses' search
inflection: jo-stem noun
tag: Nmsdy
form: m.sg.dat
element 6
dependency: obl:iobj→5