chapter view
sentence 796
i+ lemma: i 'and'
form: conjunction
urva+ lemma: urъvati 'tear down, strike down'
form: 2/3sg.aor (pf)
Elě_noušь+ lemma: Elenuš 'Helenus'
form: m.sg.nom
prěamouševъ+ lemma: Prějamušev 'of Priam'
form: m.sg.nom
snъ, lemma: sin 'son'
form: m.sg.nom
tivoucera. lemma: Tivucer 'Teucer'
form: m.sg.gen/acc.anim
di_ceouševa+ lemma: Dicev 'Diceus'
form: m.sg.gen/acc
sna. lemma: sin 'son'
form: m.sg.gen/acc.anim
ʺAnd Helenus, son of Priam, struck Teucer, son of Diceus.ʺ
total elements: 8
tree view (.svg)
linear view (Embedded brat):
view .conllu
ROOT i urva elěnoušъ prěamouševъ snъ tivoucera diceouševa sna
cc(i-2, urva-3)
root(urva-3, ROOT)
nsubj(elěnoušъ-4, urva-3)
amod:poss(prěamouševъ-5, snъ-6)
appos(snъ-6, elěnoušъ-4)
obj(tivoucera-7, urva-3)
amod:poss(diceouševa-8, sna-9)
appos(sna-9, tivoucera-7)i+
i
lemma: i 'and' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
tag: C
form: conjunction
element 1
dependency: cc→2
urva+
urva
lemma: urъvati 'tear down, strike down' search
CS
inflection: e-verb
prefixes: allative u-
tag: Vmia3se
form: 2/3sg.aor (pf)
element 2
dependency: root→0
Elě_noušь+
elěnoušъ
lemma: Elenuš 'Helenus' search
Ruseva uses lemma Elinoušъ ʹXelenʹ, which is etymologically plausible, but not attested in the Legend of Troy, preferring the spelling Elěnoušь.
inflection: jo-stem noun
tag: Nmsny
form: m.sg.nom
element 3
dependency: nsubj→2
prěamouševъ+
prěamouševъ
lemma: Prějamušev 'of Priam' search
inflection: hard adjectival
suffixes: possessive -ov-
tag: Amsnn
form: m.sg.nom
element 4
dependency: amod:poss→5
snъ,
snъ
lemma: sin 'son' SJS search
CS synъ was an u-stem. Punčo seems to follow a paradigm combining o-stem oblique case endings with u-stem direct forms (as in other monosyllabic masc nouns): sg.nom sinь, gen sina, dat sinu, voc sine, pl.nom sinove/sinovi, also pl.acc sini (< CS syny).
The two pl.nom forms may remind us of Serbo-Croat variation (pl.nom -ovi, pl.acc -ove). However, Punčo clearly prefers the form -ove (the other form comes only once in 9 instances in first 30 chapters), which is used both in subject and oblique positions.
inflection: monosyllabic noun
tag: Nmsny
form: m.sg.nom
element 5
dependency: appos→3
tivoucera.
tivoucera
lemma: Tivucer 'Teucer' search
inflection: o-stem noun
tag: Nmsgy
form: m.sg.gen/acc.anim
element 6
dependency: obj→2
di_ceouševa+
diceouševa
lemma: Dicev 'Diceus' search
inflection: o-stem noun
tag: Amsgn
form: m.sg.gen/acc
element 7
dependency: amod:poss→8
sna.
sna
lemma: sin 'son' SJS search
CS synъ was an u-stem. Punčo seems to follow a paradigm combining o-stem oblique case endings with u-stem direct forms (as in other monosyllabic masc nouns): sg.nom sinь, gen sina, dat sinu, voc sine, pl.nom sinove/sinovi, also pl.acc sini (< CS syny).
The two pl.nom forms may remind us of Serbo-Croat variation (pl.nom -ovi, pl.acc -ove). However, Punčo clearly prefers the form -ove (the other form comes only once in 9 instances in first 30 chapters), which is used both in subject and oblique positions.
inflection: monosyllabic noun
tag: Nmsgy
form: m.sg.gen/acc.anim
element 8
dependency: appos→6