chapter view
sentence 503
Zaštó lemma: zašto 'for'
form: conjunction
dioti hōs legei kai ho sofos Solomōn
kato lemma: kato 'as'
form: conjunction
káže lemma: kaža 'tell, show'
form: 2/3sg.aor (pf)
i lemma: i 'and'
form: conjunction
pre-múdry lemma: premudъr ''
form: m.sg.nom.pron
Solomónь, lemma: Solomon ''
form: m.sg.nom
because, as the most wise Solomon says:
ne lemma: ne 'no, not'
form: negation particle
Ouk oidamen ti teѯetai hē epiusa
znáĭmь lemma: znaja 'know'
form: 1pl.prs (ipf)
što lemma: što 'what'
form: interrogative
šté lemma: šta 'want'
form: 3sg.prs (ipf)
stána lemma: stana 'become, stand up'
form: 2/3sg.aor (pf)
do lemma: do 'until'
form: preposition
utrě´, lemma: utrě ''
form: adverb
ʺwe know not what (will be there) to do tomorrowʺ (cf. Preacher 7:14)
total elements: 13
tree view (.svg)
linear view (Embedded brat):
view .conllu
ROOT Zašto kato kaže i premudri Solomonъ ne znaimъ što šte stana do utrě
cc(Zašto-2, znaimъ-9)
advmod(kato-3, kaže-4)
advcl(kaže-4, znaimъ-9)
amod(i-5, Solomonъ-7)
amod(premudri-6, Solomonъ-7)
nsubj(Solomonъ-7, kaže-4)
advmod(ne-8, znaimъ-9)
root(znaimъ-9, ROOT)
mark(što-10, stana-12)
aux:fut(šte-11, stana-12)
advcl:obj(stana-12, znaimъ-9)
case(do-13, utrě-14)
advmod(utrě-14, stana-12)Zaštó
Zašto
lemma: zašto 'for' search
Used commonly with the relative meaning of zaštoto. Could be also analyzed as an interrogative pronoun. Sometimes, Paisius (and Punčo) uses it in the consequent meaning ʹthatʹ - like što or če. See čto for etymology.
suffixes: demonstrative -to
tag: C
form: conjunction
element 1
dependency: cc→8
dioti hōs legei kai ho sofos Solomōn
kato
kato
lemma: kato 'as' search
suffixes: demonstrative -to
tag: C
form: conjunction
element 2
dependency: advmod→3
káže
kaže
lemma: kaža 'tell, show' SJS LOVe search
CS kazati, 1sg.prs kažǫ, 2sg kažeši (ipf.)
inflection: e-verb
tag: Vmia3se
form: 2/3sg.aor (pf)
element 3
dependency: advcl→8
i
i
lemma: i 'and' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
tag: C
form: conjunction
element 4
dependency: amod→6
pre-múdry
premudri
tag: Amsny
form: m.sg.nom.pron
element 5
dependency: amod→6
Solomónь,
Solomonъ
tag: Nmsny
form: m.sg.nom
element 6
dependency: nsubj→3
ne
ne
lemma: ne 'no, not' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
tag: Qz
form: negation particle
element 7
dependency: advmod→8
Ouk oidamen ti teѯetai hē epiusa
znáĭmь
znaimъ
lemma: znaja 'know' SJS SNSP Miklosich LOVe search
Punčo prefers the athematic 1sg.prs form znamь.
inflection: e-verb
tag: Vmip1pi
form: 1pl.prs (ipf)
element 8
dependency: root→0
što
što
lemma: što 'what' search
Often used as relative pronoun (without the -to suffix) by Punčo. See čьto for etymology.
inflection: nominal pronoun
tag: Pq
form: interrogative
element 9
dependency: mark→11
šté
šte
lemma: šta 'want' LOVe search
Includes the future particle šte - Punčo still inflects it for person, using a full da-construction (e.g. 2pl štete da rečete ʹyou will sayʹ), but there are also other forms attested, e.g. "indefinite future" with a synthetic infinitive (2sg uze štešь potrebiju ʹyou will get what you needʹ).
The lemma belongs to a group of auxiliary verbs, which require the main verb in infinitive or in da-construction (cf. Mirčev 1978:235)
inflection: e-verb
tag: Vaip3si
form: 3sg.prs (ipf)
element 10
dependency: aux:fut→11
stána
stana
lemma: stana 'become, stand up' SJS SNSP Miklosich LOVe search
CS stati, 1sg.prs stanǫ, 2sg staneši
inflection: e-verb
suffixes: perfective -nǫ-
tag: Vmia3se
form: 2/3sg.aor (pf)
element 11
dependency: advcl:obj→8
do
do
lemma: do 'until' search
tag: Sg
form: preposition
element 12
dependency: case→13
utrě´,
utrě
tag: R
form: adverb
element 13
dependency: advmod→11