chapter view
sentence 43
a lemma: a 'and, but'
form: conjunction
povedau̯ lemma: povedať ''
form: l-ptcp (pf)
alt.analysis: m.sg.nom
hej lemma: tja 'she'
form: f.3sg.dat
čo lemma: čto 'what'
form: nom
má lemma: imam 'have'
form: 3sg.prs (ipf)
The construction 'have' + inf. is deontic, similar to DE sollen - closer to EN should than have to.
robiť. lemma: robiť ''
form: Vmn---si
and he told her, what she had to do.
total elements: 6
tree view (.svg)
linear view (Embedded brat):
view .conllu
ROOT a povedal jej čo má robiť
cc(a-2, povedal-3)
root(povedal-3, ROOT)
obl:iobj(jej-4, povedal-3)
mark(čo-5, robiť-7)
aux(má-6, robiť-7)
advcl:obj(robiť-7, jej-4)a
a
lemma: a 'and, but' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
tag: C
form: conjunction
element 1
dependency: cc→2
povedau̯
povedal
tag: Vmp--se or Amsnn
form: l-ptcp (pf) or m.sg.nom
element 2
dependency: root→0
hej
jej
lemma: tja 'she' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
Also used for f3sg personal pronoun based on the root *j-. Annotation of oblique forms: neja Pp3fsg, nei or i Pp3fsd, ja or ju Pp3fsa
Punčo prefers ona as the f.3sg.nom form.
inflection: nominal pronoun
tag: Pp3fsd
form: f.3sg.dat
element 3
dependency: obl:iobj→2
čo
čo
lemma: čto 'what' search
CS čьto. Similarly as kъto, the construction is etymologically the same as in modern BG relative pronouns: an interrogative root (going back to PIE *kʷ-) followed by the demonstrative suffix -to.
inflection: nominal pronoun
suffixes: demonstrative -to
tag: Pq---n
form: nom
element 4
dependency: mark→6
má
má
lemma: imam 'have' SJS LOVe search
CS iměti (irregular ě-/a-verb: 1sg.prs imamь, 2sg imaši) or imati (an a-/je-verb: 1sg.prs emljǫ, 2sg emlješi, SJS - link). Punčo uses various 3pl.prs forms - e.g. in chapter 062a, sentences following each other show imutь, imajutь and imatь.
inflection: a-verb
tag: Vaip3si
form: 3sg.prs (ipf)
element 5
dependency: aux→6
The construction 'have' + inf. is deontic, similar to DE sollen - closer to EN should than have to.
robiť.
robiť
tag: Vmn---si
form: Vmn---si
element 6
dependency: advcl:obj→3