ber Berlin d. - Petka

chapter view

sentence 419

zaštò lemma: zašto 'for'
form: conjunction

sín'ko lemma: sin 'son'
form: m.sg.voc

ne+ lemma: ne 'no, not'
form: negation particle

glédašъ lemma: gledam 'watch'
form: 2sg.prs (ipf)

crska+ lemma: carski 'of king'
form: f.sg.nom

ta lemma: 'the'
form: f.sg.nom

póčestъ, lemma: počest 'honor (act of honoring)'
form: f.sg.nom


ʺwhy don't you care for your royal honor, son?ʺ

total elements: 7


tree view (.svg)
linear view (Embedded brat):
view .conllu

ROOT zašto sinko ne gledašъ crska ta počestъ 
cc(zašto-2, gledašъ-5)
vocative(sinko-3, gledašъ-5)
advmod(ne-4, gledašъ-5)
root(gledašъ-5, ROOT)
amod(crska-6, počestъ-8)
det:p_adj(ta-7, crska-6)
obj(počestъ-8, gledašъ-5)


zaštò
zašto
lemma: zašto 'for' search
Used commonly with the relative meaning of zaštoto. Could be also analyzed as an interrogative pronoun. Sometimes, Paisius (and Punčo) uses it in the consequent meaning ʹthatʹ - like što or če. See čto for etymology.
suffixes: demonstrative -to
tag: C
form: conjunction
element 1
dependency: cc→4


sín'ko
sinko
lemma: sin 'son' SJS search
CS synъ was an u-stem. Punčo seems to follow a paradigm combining o-stem oblique case endings with u-stem direct forms (as in other monosyllabic masc nouns): sg.nom sinь, gen sina, dat sinu, voc sine, pl.nom sinove/sinovi, also pl.acc sini (< CS syny).
The two pl.nom forms may remind us of Serbo-Croat variation (pl.nom -ovi, pl.acc -ove). However, Punčo clearly prefers the form -ove (the other form comes only once in 9 instances in first 30 chapters), which is used both in subject and oblique positions.

inflection: monosyllabic noun
tag: Nmsvy
form: m.sg.voc
element 2
dependency: vocative→4


ne+
ne
lemma: ne 'no, not' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
tag: Qz
form: negation particle
element 3
dependency: advmod→4


glédašъ
gledašъ
lemma: gledam 'watch' LOVe search
CS ględati (e-verb)
inflection: a-verb
tag: Vmip2si
form: 2sg.prs (ipf)
element 4
dependency: root→0


crska+
crska
lemma: carski 'of king' search
inflection: hard adjectival
suffixes: relational -ьsk-
tag: Afsnn
form: f.sg.nom
element 5
dependency: amod→7


ta
ta
lemma: 'the' search
Lemma used to mark the definite suffix/article.
Sg. forms are recognized, when following adjectives or nouns: Pd-msn, ta Pd-fsn, to Pd-nsn
The plural form te is used for all genders, so the tag reflects either the head noun (if it is masc. - Pd-mpn - or fem. - Pd-fpn) or remains empty (if neut., e.g. izъ oči+te ʹfrom the eyesʹ: Pd--pn). The form ta, if following a plural, is tagged as Pd-npn
The gender of oblique articles like togo is tagged in a similar way, e.g. ta rasrъdi cra togo ʹand he angered the kingʹ: Pd-msg, while if there is no noun, it remains empty, e.g. in CS phrase togo radi ʹbecause of thatʹ: Pd--sg
In CS texts (rarely in PPS too), the root is also used for personal pronouns. If such forms can be syntactically distinguished (i.e. if they precede the head, or do not agree with it in case, gender and number), they are tagged as personal pronouns, e.g. toę oči ʹher eyesʹ: Pp3fsg
The shortened form of the article -o, frequently used by Punčo, is not separated from the preceding token, but rather handled as a quasi-case, e.g. stolʹpo ʹthe pillarʹ: Nmson

inflection: hard stem pronominal
tag: Pd-fsn
form: f.sg.nom
element 6
dependency: det:p_adj→5


póčestъ,
počestъ
lemma: počest 'honor (act of honoring)' LOVe search
inflection: i-stem noun
prefixes: delimitative po-
suffixes: verbal noun -tь
tag: Nfsnn
form: f.sg.nom
element 7
dependency: obj→4