071 pravedenь sudь 636f

chapter view

sentence 6

za_što+ lemma: zašto 'for'
form: conjunction

se lemma: se 'self'
form: refl.acc

ne+ lemma: ne 'no, not'
form: negation particle

razuméete lemma: razumeja 'understand'
form: 2pl.prs (ipf)


Why don't you become reasonable?

total elements: 4


tree view (.svg)
linear view (Embedded brat):
view .conllu

ROOT zašto se ne razumeete 
cc(zašto-2, razumeete-5)
expl(se-3, razumeete-5)
advmod(ne-4, razumeete-5)
root(razumeete-5, ROOT)


za_što+
zašto
lemma: zašto 'for' search
Used commonly with the relative meaning of zaštoto. Could be also analyzed as an interrogative pronoun. Sometimes, Paisius (and Punčo) uses it in the consequent meaning ʹthatʹ - like što or če. See čto for etymology.
suffixes: demonstrative -to
tag: C
form: conjunction
element 1
dependency: cc→4


se
se
lemma: se 'self' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
CS . The lemma is used for all forms of the reflexive pronoun. Annotation: sebe Px---g, si (and CS sebě) Px---d, se (or ) Px---a, soboju (or sobojǫ) Px---i.
inflection: nominal pronoun
tag: Px---a
form: refl.acc
element 2
dependency: expl→4


ne+
ne
lemma: ne 'no, not' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
tag: Qz
form: negation particle
element 3
dependency: advmod→4


razuméete
razumeete
lemma: razumeja 'understand' SJS SNSP Miklosich LOVe search
Biaspectual in SJS.
inflection: e-verb
prefixes: distributive raz-
suffixes: stative -ě-
tag: Vmip2pi
form: 2pl.prs (ipf)
element 4
dependency: root→0