chapter view
sentence 32
zašto lemma: zašto 'for'
form: conjunction
se lemma: se 'self'
form: refl.acc
dš̃a lemma: duša 'soul'
form: f.sg.nom
ne+ lemma: ne 'no, not'
form: negation particle
vídi lemma: vidja 'see'
form: 3sg.prs (ipf)
Because the soul cannot be seen.
total elements: 5
tree view (.svg)
linear view (Embedded brat):
view .conllu
ROOT zašto se dša ne vidi
cc(zašto-2, vidi-6)
expl(se-3, vidi-6)
nsubj(dša-4, vidi-6)
advmod(ne-5, vidi-6)
root(vidi-6, ROOT)zašto
zašto
lemma: zašto 'for' search
Used commonly with the relative meaning of zaštoto. Could be also analyzed as an interrogative pronoun. Sometimes, Paisius (and Punčo) uses it in the consequent meaning ʹthatʹ - like što or če. See čto for etymology.
suffixes: demonstrative -to
tag: C
form: conjunction
element 1
dependency: cc→5
se
se
lemma: se 'self' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
CS sę. The lemma is used for all forms of the reflexive pronoun. Annotation: sebe Px---g, si (and CS sebě) Px---d, se (or sę) Px---a, soboju (or sobojǫ) Px---i.
inflection: nominal pronoun
tag: Px---a
form: refl.acc
element 2
dependency: expl→5
dš̃a
dša
lemma: duša 'soul' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
Commonly abbreviated as дш҃а.
inflection: jā-stem noun
tag: Nfsnn
form: f.sg.nom
element 3
dependency: nsubj→5
ne+
ne
lemma: ne 'no, not' SJS SNSP Miklosich search
tag: Qz
form: negation particle
element 4
dependency: advmod→5
vídi
vidi
lemma: vidja 'see' SJS LOVe search
BG vidja ʹseeʹ is perfective, with viždam as its imperfective counterpart. Punčo uses only the first stem (1sg.prs vidim), which seems to cover both aspects (e.g. both in present and aorist tenses). Biaspectual in SJS.
inflection: i-verb
suffixes: stative -ě-
tag: Vmip3si
form: 3sg.prs (ipf)
element 5
dependency: root→0