chapter view
sentence 51
vídiš+ lemma: vidja 'see'
form: 2sg.prs (ipf)
Prologъ: to věsi li ty b-ga
Punčo likely misinterprets the irregular forms of věděti.
li lemma: li '(question particle)'
form: interrogative particle
bg̃a lemma: bog 'god'
form: m.sg.gen/acc.anim
tì lemma: ti 'you'
form: 2sg.nom
blúdnice lemma: bludnica 'adulterous woman'
form: f.sg.voc
ʺYou do know (lit. see) God, o you harlot?ʺ
total elements: 5
tree view (.svg)
linear view (Embedded brat):
view .conllu
ROOT vidiš li bga ti bludnice
root(vidiš-2, ROOT)
advmod(li-3, vidiš-2)
obj(bga-4, vidiš-2)
nsubj(ti-5, vidiš-2)
vocative(bludnice-6, vidiš-2)vídiš+
vidiš
lemma: vidja 'see' SJS LOVe search
BG vidja ʹseeʹ is perfective, with viždam as its imperfective counterpart. Punčo uses only the first stem (1sg.prs vidim), which seems to cover both aspects (e.g. both in present and aorist tenses). Biaspectual in SJS.
inflection: i-verb
suffixes: stative -ě-
tag: Vmip2si
form: 2sg.prs (ipf)
element 1
dependency: root→0
Prologъ: to věsi li ty b-ga
Punčo likely misinterprets the irregular forms of věděti.
li
li
lemma: li '(question particle)' search
tag: Qq
form: interrogative particle
element 2
dependency: advmod→1
bg̃a
bga
lemma: bog 'god' SJS search
inflection: monosyllabic noun
tag: Nmsgy
form: m.sg.gen/acc.anim
element 3
dependency: obj→1
tì
ti
lemma: ti 'you' search
Annotation of oblique forms: tebe Pp2-sg, te Pp2-sa
The nominative and dative forms are homonymous (ti) in both vernacular and literature, including PPS. A distinct 2sg.nom ty is sometimes used regularily in CS texts - if so, this is specially indicated in corpus files by using the lemma ty.
inflection: nominal pronoun
tag: Pp2-sn
form: 2sg.nom
element 4
dependency: nsubj→1
blúdnice
bludnice
lemma: bludnica 'adulterous woman' search
inflection: jā-stem noun
suffixes: agent -ьnica
tag: Nfsvy
form: f.sg.voc
element 5
dependency: vocative→1