chapter view
sentence 65
vídite+ lemma: vidja 'see'
form: 2pl.prs (pf)
li lemma: li '(question particle)'
form: interrogative particle
kakvo lemma: kakvo 'what'
form: interrogative
namь lemma: nie 'we'
form: 1pl.dat
kazu_va lemma: kazvam 'tell'
form: 3sg.prs (ipf)
st̃oe lemma: svęt 'saint'
form: n.sg.nom/acc.pron
právilo lemma: pravilo 'prayer manual'
form: n.sg.nom/acc
Do you see what the holy rule tells us?
total elements: 7
tree view (.svg)
linear view (Embedded brat):
view .conllu
ROOT vidite li kakvo namъ kazuva stoe pravilo
root(vidite-2, ROOT)
advmod(li-3, vidite-2)
mark(kakvo-4, kazuva-6)
obl:iobj(namъ-5, kazuva-6)
advcl(kazuva-6, vidite-2)
amod(stoe-7, pravilo-8)
nsubj(pravilo-8, kazuva-6)vídite+
vidite
lemma: vidja 'see' SJS LOVe search
BG vidja ʹseeʹ is perfective, with viždam as its imperfective counterpart. Punčo uses only the first stem (1sg.prs vidim), which seems to cover both aspects (e.g. both in present and aorist tenses). Biaspectual in SJS.
inflection: i-verb
suffixes: stative -ě-
tag: Vmip2pe
form: 2pl.prs (pf)
element 1
dependency: root→0
li
li
lemma: li '(question particle)' search
tag: Qq
form: interrogative particle
element 2
dependency: advmod→1
kakvo
kakvo
lemma: kakvo 'what' search
Handled as A, if used adnominally.
suffixes: demonstrative -vo
tag: Pq
form: interrogative
element 3
dependency: mark→5
namь
namъ
lemma: nie 'we' search
Annotation reflects the following schema: nas Pp1-pg, nam Pp1-pd, ni Pp1-pa
inflection: nominal pronoun
tag: Pp1-pd
form: 1pl.dat
element 4
dependency: obl:iobj→5
kazu_va
kazuva
lemma: kazvam 'tell' LOVe search
inflection: a-verb
suffixes: iterative -va-
tag: Vmip3si
form: 3sg.prs (ipf)
element 5
dependency: advcl→1
st̃oe
stoe
lemma: svęt 'saint' LOVe search
inflection: hard adjectival
tag: Ansny
form: n.sg.nom/acc.pron
element 6
dependency: amod→7
právilo
pravilo
lemma: pravilo 'prayer manual' search
inflection: o-stem noun
suffixes: causative -i-, instrument -lo
tag: Nnsnn
form: n.sg.nom/acc
element 7
dependency: nsubj→5